شناسه مطلب صحیفه
نمایش نسخه چاپی

Speech [The deplorable socio-political conditions and announcement of the Shi`ah clergy services and struggles; the anti-religious policy of the Shah regime]

A`zam Mosque, Qum
The commencement of lessons at the Qum theological center after the conclusion of the Provincial and District Council disturbances
The deplorable socio-political conditions and announcement of the Shi`ah clergy services and struggles; the anti-religious policy of the Shah regime
The `ulama', instructors and students of religious sciences and residents of Qum
جلد ۱ صحیفه امام خمینی (ره)، از صفحه ۱۰۸ تا صفحه ۱۲۰
[In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful]

The uprising of the Commander of the Faithful (`a) against Mu`awiyah «1»

... meanwhile this was a necessary reminder that all governments should heed. From the advent of Islam, Muslims have been the guardians of the true religion of Islam even when they lost their rights for the sake of protecting the religion. Hadrat Amir al-Mu'minin, the Commander of the Faithful (`a) , co-operated with the caliphs because they outwardly followed the religious precepts, and chaos did not prevail until Mu`awiyah came to power and he deviated from the path and customs of the caliphs and transformed the caliphate into a monarchy. Under such circumstances, Imam `Ali had no choice but to rise up against him, for according to the rules of religion and logic, he could not tolerate Mu`awiyah to remain in that post for a single day. Those of his advisers who out of ignorance advised Imam `Ali to wait until his rule became stronger and then depose Mu`awiyah did not know that had he waited, he would have met with objections from the Muslims and after strengthening his position, he would not have been able to dismiss Mu`awiyah. «2»
Nowadays, there may be some uninformed people who believe it would have been better if Imam `Ali had made his position stronger and then deposed Mu`awiyah, but they are mistaken. Thus, when Imam `Ali realized that a cruel government was coming to power, revolt was a divine duty and he carried it out.
In this way, too, the infallible Imams revolted; even if they were few in number, they would fight to death in order to carry out their religious duties. Whenever one of the Imams saw that revolt was not appropriate, he stayed at home and propagated Islam instead. This was the way from the beginning of Islam.

Action of Mirza, the Great

The `ulama' and leaders of Islam have always advised the people to maintain their composure. It was not so long ago that Mirza the Great, the late Haj Mirza Muhammad Hasan Shirazi «3» lived. He was a great intellectual thinker who lived in Samarra' «4» and although he advocated quietism and reconciliation, when he realized that Islam was in danger and the cruel king at that time wanted to wipe out Islam by using foreign companies, this old man sitting in a small city with only three hundred of tullab [seminarians] around him was forced to admonish the despotic king. His writings have been preserved. That king did not listen and with offensive and impolite statements he defied the lofty position of this great scholar until the latter was forced to say a word so that independence could be restored.
After realizing that Iraq was exposed to danger, the late Mirza Muhammad-Taqi Shirazi «5» spoke out in support of the Arabs and changed matters. If he had not done so, Iraq would have been destroyed. All Muslim states are indebted to this group of men (the clergymen) ; it is they who, up until now, have guarded their independence. They are one of the resources of the Islamic countries, and it is through their counsel that arrogant people are silenced. By the same token, when the clergymen see that Islam is in danger they strive as much as possible and if they feel that by making issues public knowledge, by giving speeches and sending messages the danger can be averted, so be it, but if not they have no choice but to rise up and take action.
The clergymen wish to see harmony and unity exist among all Muslims; however, they can only maintain their silence insofar as national independence is not endangered by things that even the government may be unaware of or may not understand. These duties are determined by religion, it is not that the `ulama' say something of their own accord; this kind of uprising is that which is stipulated by religion and the Holy Qur'an.

Divine grace for the government and the Shah

On the evening before the people were to go to the Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque to pray for the awakening of the government, «6» I was informed that the state was planning to resist. Under such circumstances, I realized that the `ulama' had another duty. I made the final decision while praying «7» and beseeching the Almighty God and I told no one, but God was gracious towards the Shah, the state and the nation. If, God forbid, any disrespect had been aimed at the `ulama' of Tehran, I would have made a grave decision, but around midnight, the administration realized that it could not withstand the power of the people, and that same night it took a document from the great `ulama' of Tehran so that the problem would be resolved. «8» The following morning a telegram also arrived in Qum while I was at Mr. Shari`atmadari's home. «9» The telegram was a good sign, but there was fear of deceit until news of the annulment of the Provincial and District Councils Bill was published in the newspapers after several communications between here and Tehran. «10» However, they are not finished speaking yet.

Anti-Qur'anic laws are illegal

Concerning these municipality laws that, he claims, have been accepted by the `ulama', they have not been accepted, they have been objected to. Furthermore, the laws governing the Provincial and District Councils cannot be compared with those for the municipalities, which are said to be" similar", and to make such a comparison is erroneous. «11» However, in both cases, being male and Muslim has been included and stipulated in the text of the law. In addition to this, we are the ones to compel them to uphold what they themselves are committed to. «12» Not that the constitutional law is complete and final in our opinion, but if the `ulama' refer to the law it is because of the second article of the amendment to the Constitution which invalidates the legality of any law which opposes the Holy Qur'an. «13» For we do not concern ourselves with these laws, «14» we are concerned only with the Islamic laws. The `ulama' of Islam are interested in the laws of the Qur'an and the traditions of the Prophet and Imams, anything that agrees with the Qur'an we will humbly submit to and anything which is incompatible with the religion and violates the Islamic laws, be that the constitutional law or even international laws, we will oppose. «15»
Brawl is peacefully ended with the effort of the `ulama' Praise be to God the matter is now over; Mr. Asadullah `Alam was warned that this matter must be ended and thanks to God it has ended. We are grateful that (praise be to God) it ended without a battle or war, without a drop of blood being shed. Such a matter, which could have ended in a great national uprising and could have moved nomads, ended with not even one person being slapped! During small, local uprisings and wars which involve thousands of people often a few are killed, and several are wounded, it is not possible that during an uprising of twenty million not even one person's nose bleeds! The state does not realize who prevented chaos or battle from occurring. They should come and see what has been written in the letters we have received and what has been said by the people who came to talk to us. «16»
They came to us with tears in their eyes," Give us an order, a word from you that our souls will have everlasting life and see what happens." We told them that we did not ask that of them. But if a single
«۱»- Mu`awiyah ibn Abou Sufyan was the first caliph of the `Umayyad dynasty (۴۰ AH/ ۶۶۲ CE) , which ruled the Muslim world after the martyrdom of the Commander of the Faithful, `Ali ibn Abi Talib and the five-month rule of the second Imam, Hasan ibn `Ali (`a) . As the founder of the Umayyad dynasty (`Umayyad is derived from Bani `Umayyah, the name of the tribe to whom he belonged) , Mu`awiyah revived hereditary monarchy and aristocracy in sharp contrast and opposition to the rudimentary precepts of Islam. History is replete with innumerable instances of cruelty and oppression perpetrated in the world of Islam during the reign of the `Umayyads including the murder, banishment and imprisonment of the followers of the Prophet's Progeny [Ahl al-Bayt] (`a) as epitomized by the tragedy in Karbala (۶۱ AH) during the reign of Mu`awiyah's son and second `Umayyad caliph, Yazid«۲»- Mu`awiyah opposed the expulsion order. Mughayyar ibn Shu`bah and Ibn `Abbas (Imam `Ali's cousin) did not agree with Mu`awiyah's expulsion and recommended that Imam `Ali be lenient and condescending for two years until the people of Syria swore allegiance to him, and then take action against him. But Imam `Ali would not accept that Mu`awiyah rule over the lives and wealth of the Muslim people for even a short period of time.«۳»- Mirza Muhammad Hassan Shirazi (۱۸۱۲- ۱۸۹۴) , better known as Mirza Shirazi the Great I, was the most learned marja` of his era and was one of the highest ranking `ulama'. He issued the famous order for the tobacco boycott. Early in his life he left Shiraz and went to study with the `ulama' in Isfahan; from there he went to Iraq (to the `atabat, i. e. the major centers of Shi`ah learning in Iraq: the holy shrines in Karbala, Najaf and Kazimayn) . There he studied under Shaykh Murtada Ansari, before he himself began to teach. During the period that he was marja` at-taqlid in ۱۸۹۱, the Qajar Shah, Nasiruddin, signed a contract with an English company granting it a fifty-year monopoly over the distribution and exportation of tobacco. As concern over the concession swept through the country, Ayatullah Shirazi issued a fatwa stating that the use of tobacco in whatever form was forbidden [haram] and was tantamount to declaring war with Imam of the Time (the Twelfth Imam) in order to curtail the spread of British influence in the country. Consequently, Nasiruddin Shah was faced with no alternative but to annul the concession.«۴»- The city of Samarra' is of interest to Muslims and is a famous place of Shi`ah pilgrimage. This city is located in Iraq, ۱۲۰ km north of Baghdad and lies on the east bank of the Tigris River. Several times the ancient city of Samarra' has been destroyed and rebuilt. It is the burial site of Imam `Ali an-Naqi (`a) , the tenth Imam, and Imam Hasan al-`Askari (`a) , the eleventh Imam. There is also a famous basement there which is said to be the place where the twelfth Imam, Imam al-Mahdi (may God expedite his glorious advent) went into occultation. The ancient name of this city was" Surra man ra'a," which means" Whoever sees it shall be gladdened".«۵»- Mirza Muhammad-Taqi Shirazi (d ۱۹۲۱) , better known as Mirza Mujahid II, was one of the great Shi`ah marja` and one of the students of Mirza Shirazi the Great. He was a leading force (after Ayatullah Sayyid Kazim Tabataba'i) in the resistance by the Shi`ah `ulama' opposed to the imposition of British rule on Iraq at the end of the First World War. His requisition reads as follows:" It is the religious duty of the Iraqi people to demand their rights."«۶»- The numerous telegrams sent from the `ulama' to `Alam's government requesting the abolition of the Provincial and District Councils Bill and the government's refusal to reply, forced the clergy of Tehran to seek assistance from Almighty God and in order to remind the people of important matters they decided to hold a gathering at the Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque on Thursday morning, November ۲۹, ۱۹۶۲ [Azar ۸, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] . This information was disseminated among the people by way of leaflets. The great elderly clergymen Ayatullah Behbahani and Ayatullah Tonekabuni decided to remain in the Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque until the Provincial and District Councils Bill was annulled. This news caused public uproar, and the pious people, who could not bear to see their marja` and religious leaders inconvenienced and dissatisfied in this way, decided to join them in the mosque to express their opposition to the government. The Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque is one of the major mosques in Tehran and was an Islamic revolutionary base during the time of the resurgence and is located within Tehran's main bazaar.«۷»- Praying and weeping.«۸»- As the Provincial and District Councils disturbances continued and the `ulama' of Tehran issued an invitation to the people to join them in a protest gathering at the Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque on November ۲۹, ۱۹۶۲ [Azar ۸, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] , `Alam's government felt increasingly threatened. That same night it held a meeting during which the Provincial and District Councils Bill was rescinded and notification was sent to the `ulama' of Tehran. Also, in order to prevent the prayer gathering of the next day, the government decided to send `Imad Turbati, the Prime Minister's representative, in the middle of the night to the homes of the respected clergymen Behbahani, Khwansari, Amoli, Tonekabuni, to obtain their signatures at the bottom of a document declaring the cancellation of the aforementioned gathering. At ۵ am this document was distributed in the Tehran Bazaar and the surrounding streets. It stated:" The Prime Minister has announced that the bill concerning the election for Provincial and District Councils which was ratified by the government will not be implemented. Therefore, thanks to all the Muslims' efforts, the gathering on Thursday, Rajab ۱, [November ۲۹] which was supposed to be held in the Sayyid `Azizullah Mosque is no longer necessary."«۹»- The telegram containing the news of the abolition of the Provincial and District Councils Bill was sent to Sayyid Kazim Shari`atmadari and the great Ayatullahs Golpaygani and Najafi-Mar`ashi in Qum from the Prime Minister's palace. Refraining from sending a telegram to Imam Khomeini was evidence of the regime's anger regarding his stance.«۱۰»- Even though the government had promised to publish news of the bill's annulment in the newspapers, it considered it sufficient merely to send telegrams to the great maraji` and `ulama'. This greatly angered the Imam and the other clergymen. Thus, by sending a letter and special messenger to Tehran and other cities, Imam requested that the clergy continue in their opposition until news of the annulment be published in the newspapers. This action forced the Prime Minister to announce the abolition of the bill during an interview on December ۱, ۱۹۶۲ [Azar ۱۰, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] . After this, the newspaper headlines read:" The government has revoked the bill dated October ۶, ۱۹۶۲ [Mehr ۱۴, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] ."«۱۱»- After the clergy and the people had waited one month for an answer regarding the government's opinion, on Monday, October ۱۴, ۱۹۶۲ [Mehr ۲۲, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] the Prime Minister in a telegram to Sayyid Kazim Shari`atmadari and the Grand Ayatullahs Najafi-Mar`ashi and Golpaygani stated:" ... concerning the government's silence on the issue of the non-participation of women in the Provincial and District Councils, I must remind the worthy gentlemen that the conditions concerning this bill are the same as those which apply to the elections for the town councils' bill which was ratified seven years ago and to which no opposition has ever been raised." Imam Khomeini in reply to questions put to him by the merchants and businessmen of Qum regarding his views on the Prime Minister's interview dated December ۱۲, ۱۹۶۲ [Azar ۲۱, ۱۳۴۱ AHS] rejected `Alam's claims concerning the similarity of the bill with the town council bill. His statements in this regard were later published as his declaration in reply to the Prime Minister. See Nahdat-e Rouhaniyyoun-e Iran, vol. ۳, pp. ۱۱۲- ۱۱۵.«۱۲»- This phrase is contained in the irrevocable law and is one of the major rules of religious jurisprudence, according to which in legal and juristic issues the people are expected to comply with the precepts of their religion and the laws which they themselves have chosen. Imam's intention here is to draw attention to the contradictory nature of the Provincial and District Councils Bill with the constitutional law which the government is bound to. By referring to the aforesaid rule, he emphasized that his words did not constitute a recognition of the legitimacy of the constitutional or any other law, for that came from the law's compliance with the laws of the religion. For further information concerning irrevocable laws see Wasa'il ash-Shi`ah, vol. ۱۵, Kitab at-Talaq, Abwab Muqaddamat wa Shara'itah, chap. ۳۰.«۱۳»- The second amendment to the constitutional law declared that:" The Holy National Consultative Assembly, which has been established through the assistance and favor of the twelfth Imam (may God expedite his glorious advent) , should not at any time allow any of its articles of laws to contradict the rules of Islam or the laws of Hadrat Khayr al-Anam [the Best of Beings] (i. e., Prophet Muhammad (s) ). It is obvious that the responsibility for determining which laws are at variance with the laws of Islam is and has been with the most learned `ulama', (may God prolong their beneficial existence) . Therefore, it is officially decided that in any period of time a group of not less than five Islamic jurisprudents [mujtahids] and fuqaha who are aware of current events will be selected to do this. Thus, the most learned `ulama' and maraji` at-taqlid will introduce twenty names from amongst the `ulama', who are qualified, to the National Consultative Assembly. Five or more will be chosen by unanimous vote or by drawing lots, and will be recognized as members so that all the articles proposed to the Majlis are carefully analyzed and negotiated, and every article which is at variance with the holy laws of Islam is rescinded. The vote of this group of `ulama' must be obeyed and followed, and this article is irrevocable until Imam Mahdi's appearance."«۱۴»- Meaning that we will not accept any law except Islamic law, the laws of the Constitution which follow religious law are accepted by us.«۱۵»- The Shah and `Alam's government wanted to pass the Provincial and District Councils Bill and violate Islam and the Constitution in the name of progress and using the excuse of the prevailing circumstances and their international obligations. The Shah in answer to a telegram sent by the maraji` announced these changes to be trivial and to have arisen from the current situation. In one of his speeches, `Alam, while condemning any revolt, implicitly described the current activities of the `ulama' as being reactionary measures and added that the wheels of time could not be turned back and the government would not change its mind concerning the reform programs.«۱۶»- The high-ranking `ulama' of the theology centers inside the country, clergymen, scholars, preachers, merchants, tradesmen and religious groups supported the actions of the maraji` of Qum for the abolition of the Provincial and District Councils Bill in successive letters, telegrams and papers which contained thousands of signatures. They regularly expressed to the Shah and the government, and especially the maraji`, the aversion and apprehension of the local citizens concerning the bill, and requested the abolition of the bill.


امام خمینی (ره)؛ 11 آذر 1341

فراز طلایی

دیدگاه ها

نظر دهید

اولین دیدگاه را به نام خود ثبت کنید: